No. 18-8404
Adrian Laroy Seymore v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: burden-of-proof criminal-procedure district-court-discretion due-process evidence evidentiary-standard government-evidence presentence-investigation-report sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-review
Key Terms:
Privacy
Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a District Court erred in applying a guideline enhancement based solely on allegations contained in the Presentence Investigation Report after (1) a defendant objects to the factual basis for the enhancement, and (2) the government fails to present any evidence supporting the disputed factual basis for the enhancement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | Whether a District Court erred in applying a guideline enhancement based solely on | allegations contained in the Presentence Investigation Report after (1) a defendant objects to the factual basis for the enhancement, and (2) the government fails to | present any evidence supporting the disputed factual basis for the enhancement. | | , | | 1 ; !
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Adrian Seymore
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent