Whether the Court of Appeals of Maryland erred when it denied the Petitioner's petition for writ of certiorari

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether the Court of Appeals of Maryland erred when it denied the Petitioner’s petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals, stating there has been no showing that review by certiorari is desirable and in the public interest? Whether the Court of Appeals of Maryland erred when it denied the Petitioner’s petition for writ of certiorari when the Court of Special Appeals (COSA): ‘ a. Failed to dismiss the 2018 state non-judicial foreclosure action because the Respondents lacked standing to invoke . the state court’s jurisdiction, due to the Respondents violating federal law, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) once they filed the foreclosure action, therefore divesting the circuit court of subject matter jurisdiction? b. Failed to rule on the Petitioner’s jurisdictional challenge, and that the circuit court and COSA lacked jurisdiction to continue the state action until jurisdiction was proven on the record? c. Failed to grant the Petitioner a hearing on the merits, thus denying the Petitioner due process and equal protection of law? d. Failed to remand the case back to the circuit court to be . dismissed, because the Respondents lacked standing to ; file the foreclosure action due to their violations of federal law, divesting the circuit court of subject matter jurisdiction? i LIST OF ALL PARTIES The Petitioner is Renee L. McCray, the Appellant below and Defendant in the circuit court non-judicial foreclosure action. Respondents are the Appellees below and Plaintiffs in the circuit court nonjudicial foreclosure action, and the Respondents are also debt collectors.