Whether the shoulder of a public street should be treated as an airport or a public forum for First Amendment purposes

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; L Whether the shoulder of a public street, : owned by the Jacksonville Aviation Authority, but approximately one mile from the Jacksonville International Airport, should be treated as an airport and, therefore, a traditional non-public forum, or should be treated as a public street or sidewalk and, : therefore, a quintessential public forum, for purpose of First Amendment forum analysis. I. Whether a _ public airport authority’s reservation of a right to disapprove an “application for protest” upon an applicant’s ability to “demonstrate adequate financial capacity or responsibility to undertake the proposed use” or alternatively upon an applicant’s ability to “obtain a bond or insurance in a type and amount required by ; the Authority for the proposed use,” provides a “reasonably specific and objective” standard : for approval of such applications, as required by Thomas v. Chicago Park Dist., 534 U.S. 316, 324, 122 S.Ct. 775, 781, 151 L.Ed.2d 783 (2002).