No. 18-8420
Kevin Anthony Briggs v. Montana
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights defendant-responsibility defense-counsel presumption presumption-of-delay rescheduling-trial sixth-amendment sixth-amendment-claim speedy-trial trial-delay withdrawal-of-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a delay caused by permissive withdrawal of defense counsel, and the subsequent delay in rescheduling trial, is presumed to be caused by a defendant in a Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim.
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a delay caused by permissive withdrawal of defense counsel, and the subsequent delay in rescheduling trial, is presumed to be caused by a defendant in a Sixth Amendment speedy trial claim. 1
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent State of Montana to respond filed.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2019)
Attorneys
Kevin Briggs
Nicholas Kirby Brooke — Smith & Stephens, P.C., Petitioner
Nicholas Kirby Brooke — Smith & Stephens, P.C., Petitioner
State of Montana
Tammy K Plubell — Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Tammy K Plubell — Attorney General's Office, Respondent