Did the circuit court of appeals err when it denied (COA) status on the point raised that the U.S. district court abused its discretion by not allowing Mr. Thomas to amend his 28 U.S.C. 2254, in conflict with this court's decision of Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) DID THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR WHEN IT DENIED (COA) STATUS ON THE POINT RAISED THAT THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ABUSED IT’S DISCRETION BY NOT ALLOWING MR. THOMAS TO AMEND HIS 28 U.S.C. 2254, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURT’S DECISION OF SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). I) DID THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR WHEN IT DENIED (COA) STATUS ON THE POINT RAISED THAT THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN ITS DETERMINATION AS OF EXHAUSTION AND MERITS OF GROUNDS ONE OF HIS 28 USC. 2254, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURT'S DECISION OF SLACK V. MCDANIEL 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). . MM) DID THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ERR ; WHEN IT DENIED (COA) STATUS ON THE POINT RAISED THAT THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN ITS DETERMINATION AS OF LAW OF THE CASE DOCTRINE AND MERITS OF GROUND TWO OF HIS 28 U.S.C. 2254, IN CONFLICT WITH THIS COURT’S DECISION OF SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). 2