No. 18-8422

Johnny M. Young v. Alabama

Lower Court: Alabama
Docketed: 2019-03-13
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: access-to-courts civil-rights due-process federal-law standing state-courts supremacy-clause
Key Terms:
Punishment
Latest Conference: 2019-10-11 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether denial of in forma pauperis by the Alabama Supreme Court is in conflict with the United States Supreme Court precedent on federal rights of access to the courts?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : I. WHETHER DENIAL OF IN FORMA PAUPERIS BY THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE UNITDE STATES : SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT ON FEDERAL RIGHTS OF ACCESS : TO THE COURTS? II. WHETHER THE SUPREMACY LAW OF ARTICLE VI CLAUSE 2, TO THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION IMPOSES A DUTY UPON ALL STATE JUDGES TO ENFORCE FEDERAL LAW? i. Ld ©

Docket Entries

2019-10-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-09-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2019.
2019-08-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main Document
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-17
Waiver of right of respondent Alabama to respond filed.
Main Document
2019-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2019)
AppendixPetitionMotion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisProof of Service

Attorneys

Alabama
Edmund Gerard LaCour Jr. — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Johnny M. Young
Johnny M. Young — Petitioner