No. 18-8423
Willie White v. Justin Hammers, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2248 administrative-law application-granted civil-procedure court-order court-orders default-judgment due-process federal-statute habeas-corpus judicial-procedure procedural-default respondent-failure statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus
DueProcess FifthAmendment Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the application should have been granted after the respondent failed to reply to the court orders
Question Presented (from Petition)
No question identified. : . . QUESTION(S). PRESENTED . (1) Once Respondent failed to reply to the court: orders on October 26,2017, . should the application have been granted via 28.U.S.C. § 2248. s ” (i) ° | .
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-18
Waiver of right of respondent Justin Hammers, Warden to respond filed.
2019-01-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2019)