No. 18-8427
Malcolm Roy Evans v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-procedure-rights criminal-trial due-process ineffective-assistance judicial-discretion judicial-inquiry right-to-counsel right-to-testify self-representation
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court may summarily prohibit an accused from testifying in his own defense
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW WHETHER A TRIAL COURT MAY SUMMARILY PROHIBIT AN ACCUSED FROM TESTIFYING IN HIS OWN DEFENSE IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL MERELY FOR STATING TO THE JURY HIS BELIEF THAT HIS RIGHTS WERE BEING VIOLATED? WHETHER A TRIAL COURT MUST INQUIRE INTO AN ACCUSED’S COMPLAINTS ABOUT CONSTITUTIONALLY INADEQUATE REPRESENTATION BY COUNSEL? ii
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2019)
Attorneys
Malcolm Roy Evans
Jordan S. Kushner — Jordan Kushner Law office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent