Does Ohio's death penalty scheme violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury as explained in Hurst v. Florida?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does Ohio’s death penalty scheme in which a jury’s death verdict is a mere recommendation and in which a death sentence may not be imposed unless a judge makes additional factual findings violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury as explained in Hurst v. Florida? If Ohio’s death penalty scheme does violate the Sixth Amendment right to a jury as set forth in Hurst v. Florida, can a capital defendant’s jury waiver that predates Hurst be understood as a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver of his penalty-phase Sixth Amendment right as identified in Hurst? i