No. 18-8448

Edward Bishop v. United States

Lower Court: Seventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure digital-evidence digital-files dna-evidence evidence fourth-amendment particularity-requirement probable-cause search-warrant
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does a search warrant which described the place to be searched and the things to be seized fail the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Question Presented 1. Does a search warrant which described the place to be searched and the things to be seized as “any evidence (including, all photos, videos, and/or other digital files, including, removable memory cards) of suspect identity, motive, scheme/plan along with DNA evidence of the crime of Criminal Recklessness with a deadly weapon which is hidden or secreted [in the cell phone or] related to the offense of Dealing illegal drugs” fail the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution? Parties 2 1.Petitioner, Edward Bishop 2. Respondent, United States of America.

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-22
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 17, 2019)

Attorneys

Edward Bishop
William J StevensWilliam J Stevens, Petitioner
William J StevensWilliam J Stevens, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent