No. 18-8449
Juan Bustos-Chavez v. Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence alibi alibi-evidence due-process federal-courts habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel merits-review murray-v-carrier procedural-review
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the actual innocence exception established by Murray v. Carrier applies to alibi evidence
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : I. Whether the actual innocence exception established by Murray v. Carrier, applies to alibi evidence; Il. Whether, based on the alibi evidence submitted in the pro se habeas application, Mr. Bustos-chavez was entitled to a review of the merits of his habeas claims in both the federal district and appellate courts. X LISTOFPARTIES Alistof
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2019)
Attorneys
Matthew Hansen, Warden, et al.
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent