Whether the erroneously admitted evidence reviewed objectively in light of the entire record before the jury was sufficiently material to provide the basis for conviction or to remove a reasonable doubt that would have existed on the record without it

Question Presented PERT LHENT 2 Whether a state Ariel cowt's Hier Colloguy and ofbrevieted review of evidence velevent #0 a Bofson thalleage SetisFies i#s obligation undev step chree of the Botson inguivy A consider “all of He Civeumsfances Hot Seer upon the issue of ratial animosity, Saydev v. Sovisiana, SS US. 972,978 62008), . This Bvithg Case No. /b-1187 La The Supreme Lourt oF The United Stotes “PETZ7L0N FOR A WRET OF ERRTEORARTL" Mores 39,17 DANEEAN Fane 53,2817 wi Ph ou Sesng place om rhe couvt docket sheet befove the “‘TusTZeB's"uf the Cowt te . decide on sf legal merits, 1s on vied $0 Pervasive es fo hove denied 7ZrwesSale @ Fundamenfolly Fair review fat existed om Phe reesvd et ial, 4a