No. 18-8472
James Allen Eapmon v. United States
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process first-step-act life-imprisonment mandatory-minimum sentencing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER THE PETITIONER WAS DENIED DUE PROCESS WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT ERRONEOUSLY CONCLUDED THAT IT WAS OBLIGATED TO IMPOSED. A STATUTORY MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE OF LIFE IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF RELEASE?
WHETHER THE PETITIONEER IS ENTITLED TO BE RESENTENCED UNDER THE "FIRST STEP ACT"?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-petitioner-was-denied-due-process
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-05-31
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 1, 2019 to May 31, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 31, 2019.
2019-04-01
Response Requested. (Due May 1, 2019)
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 18, 2019)
Attorneys
James Allen Eapmon
James Allen Eapmon — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent