No. 18-8476
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: capital-sentencing collateral-consequences constitutional-due-process criminal-procedure death-penalty due-process harmless-error jury-instructions mitigating-factors sentencing sentencing-guidelines standard-of-proof
Key Terms:
DueProcess Punishment
DueProcess Punishment
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Maryland Court of Appeals erred in finding that Grandison failed to prove he suffered significant collateral consequences from his unconstitutional death sentence, when it was legally impossible to determine beyond a reasonable doubt under the harmless error test whether the jury's consideration of death sentences under the preponderance of the evidence standard was harmless
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ee |
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-08
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2019-02-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2019)