No. 18-8477

Lester D. Fletcher v. Ashton Baldwin Carter, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: ames-v-kansas case-remand civil-procedure civil-rights disability-accommodation-discrimination disability-discrimination due-process eeoc eeoc-v-united-airlines original-jurisdiction standing subject-matter-jurisdiction supreme-court
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity ERISA DueProcess EmploymentDiscrimina
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does the Supreme Court's original jurisdiction allow parties to bring suit in any court with jurisdiction over the parties or subject matter?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In 1888 Decision in Ames v. Kanas, in which the Court ruled that parties embraced by the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction could bring suit in any court with jurisdiction over the parties or Subject Matter. Question: So in cases like EEOC v. United Airlines, when that case was sent back to the District Court or EEOC by the Supreme Court’s ruling over Disability Accommodation Discrimination, “Subject Matter Jurisdiction” was granted and is granted with similar cases? . : | II

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-02
Waiver of right of respondent UNITED STATES to respond filed.
2019-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2019)

Attorneys

Lester D. Fletcher
Lester Fletcher — Petitioner
UNITED STATES
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent