Did the Eleventh Circuit err by holding this 'startling, intentional' violation of the defendant's constitutional and statutory rights did not constitute structural or hybrid error and therefore required a showing of prejudice

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The district court ordered the government, at a critical stage of the trial, to present inculpatory and disputed evidence in the absence of the defendant and her counsel. Did the Eleventh Circuit err by holding this “startling, intentional” violation of the defendant’s constitutional and statutory rights did not constitute structural or hybrid error and therefore required a showing of prejudice. INTERESTED PARTIES There are no