1. Is the petitioner entitled to immediate relief, including mandamus or prohibition from this Court, to protect his constitutional and statutory rights guaranteed in Massaro v. United States, 538 US 500, to a full and fair judicial review of cognizable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel with an evidentiary hearing to resolve material factual disputes never resolved in his 2012 28 U.S.C. §2255 petition?

2'. Is the failure of the district court and the United States Court of Appeals to hold an evidentiary hearing to allow the petitioner to develop an ineffective assistance of counsel claim that he was coerced into pleading guilty to a crime he did not commit by the AUSA and his attorneys, who later refused to move for withdrawl of his guilty plea as ordered before sentencing, the type of' extraordinary circumstances correctable by mandamus?

Is the petitioner entitled to immediate relief, including mandamus or prohibition from this Court, to protect his constitutional and statutory rights guaranteed in Massaro v. United States, 538 US 500, to a full and fair judicial review of cognizable claims of ineffective assistance of counsel with an evidentiary hearing to resolve material factual disputes