No. 18-8489
Danny R. Moore v. Gene Beasley, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-law criminal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-precedent mathis-decision retroactivity saving-clause section-2255 sentencing statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court's decision in Mathis v. United States,136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) should apply
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether this Court's decision in Mathis v. United States,136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016) should apply. Whether the Saving Clause Of § 2255 Applies to claim (i)
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-02
Waiver of right of respondent Gene Beasley, Warden to respond filed.
2019-03-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Gene Beasley, Warden
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent