No. 18-8492

Reginald Gibson v. James Haviland, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-claims constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process ohio-constitution post-conviction-relief procedural-default res-judicata state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal defendant is denied due process of law if the state improperly invokes its res judicata rule

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a criminal defendant is denied due process of law, if the state improperly invokes its res judicata rule for the sake of denying a post-conviction relief petition? 2. Did the Court of Appeals for the State of Ohio correctly conclude that the Petitioner filed a Motion for Leave to File a Delayed Appeal, after the trial court failed to render its Finding of Facts and Conclusion of Law as mandated by R.C. 2953.21(C) under the Ohio Constitution? : 3. Whether reasonable jurists would debate if a District Court’s determination that the Petitioner has defaulted all constitutional claims asserted in the post-conviction relief . petition by failing to comply with the state procedural rule, and not show “cause” and “prejudice” to excuse this default? 2

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent James Haviland to respond filed.
2018-10-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 19, 2019)

Attorneys

James Haviland
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Reginald Gibson
Reginald Gibson — Petitioner
Reginald Gibson — Petitioner