Is a supervised release revocation sentence of a length more than double the top of the advisory Guideline range substantively unreasonable if the district court imposes it without addressing extensive evidence of the impact of the defendant's serious mental health conditions?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Is a supervised release revocation sentence of a length more than double the top of the advisory Guideline range substantively unreasonable if the district court imposes it without addressing extensive evidence of the impact of the defendant’s serious mental health conditions? i NO. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM 2018 ORYAN YAZZIE, Petitioner, VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. DECLARATION OF COUNSEL Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.2, I, Margaret A. Katze, Assistant Federal Public Defender for the District of New Mexico, declare under penalty of perjury that I am a member of the bar of this court and counsel for Petitioner Oryan Yazzie and that I caused to be mailed a copy of the petition for writ of certiorari to this court by first class mail, postage prepaid by depositing the original and ten copies in an envelope addressed to the Clerk of this Court, in the United States Post Office at 1135 Broadway Blvd. NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, at approximately p.m. on the 15" day of March 2019. Margaret A. Katze Attorney for Petitioner FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER 111 Lomas NW, Suite 501 Albuquerque, NM 87102 (505) 346-2489 ii