No. 18-8501

Mohammed Bah v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-21
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law deportation-consequences guilty-plea immigrant-rights immigration ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel lee-v-united-states prejudice
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does an analysis of prejudice in the context of ineffective assistance of counsel involving the guilty plea of an immigrant result in an unreasonable application of Lee v. United States,137 S.Ct. 1958 (2017) where no consideration is given as to how an attorney's misadvice concerning the deportation consequences affected the decision to plead guilty?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED ~ 1. Does an analysis of prejudice in the context of ineffective assistance of | ; counsel involving the guilty plea of an immigrant result: in'a unreasonable. . application of Lee v. United States,137 S.Ct. 1958 (2017) where no considérdtion | . is given as to how an attorney's misadvice concerning the deportation consequences : affected the decision to plead guilty? . St, SE a us ‘ wa Te ad |

Docket Entries

2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-27
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)

Attorneys

Mohammed Bah
Mohammed Bah — Petitioner
Mohammed Bah — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent