No. 18-8504
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing due-process imprisonment procedural-reasonableness reasonableness sentencing sentencing-factors sentencing-guidelines supervised-release
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the imposition of the same twenty-five year term of imprisonment and maximum term of supervised release was both procedurally and substantively unreasonable
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, on remand, imposition of the same twenty-five year term of imprisonment and maximum term of supervised release was both procedurally and substantively unreasonable. i
Docket Entries
2019-04-22
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/18/2019.
2019-03-28
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
John Whaley
James Matthew Branden — Law Office of James M. Branden, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent