Whether petitioner was deprived of the right to counsel

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1). WHETHER PETITIONER WAS DEPRIVED OF THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL BY THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT'S FAILURE TO APPOINT COUNSEL AFTER PETITIONER DEMONSTRATED THAT HE WAS INDIGENT AND THAT HE COULD NO LONGER AFFORD COUNSEL? 2). WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT FAILED TO PROVE ATTEMPT CONVICTION BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT? 3). WHETHER § 851(b) COLLOQUY ERROR WAS NOT HARMLESS? 4). WHETHER THE UNDERLYING CONVICTION IS IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH SEVENTH CIRCUIT PRECEDENT? 5). WHETHER PETITIONER WAS IMPROPERLY CHARGED WITH ATTEMPT? 6). WHETHER THE SIMPLE NEGOTIATION OF A DRUG DEAL CONSTITUTES AN ATTEMPT CHARGE? 7). WHETHER THE ATTEMPT STATUTE OF 21 U.S.C. § 846 REQUIRES THE PRESENCE OF DEFENDANT? 8). WHETHER THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT IS REQUIRED TO SPECIFY THE SUB. STANTIAL STEP CONDUCT TO THAT. SUSTAINS THE CONVICTION? 9). WHETHER THE FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTS TO SUPPORT PRIOR 1999 CONVICTION DEPRIVES PROOF BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT? 10). WHETHER THE UNDERLYING CONVICTION IS BASED ON THE ABUSE OF THE ATTEMPT STATUTE? 11). WHETHER THE UNDERLYING CONVICTION IS BASED ON SPECULATION? PARTIES All parties appear in the caption on the cover page. . a i.