No. 18-8510
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-counsel criminal-procedure direct-appeal due-process federal-law ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel retroactivity right-to-be-present right-to-presence state-law trial-counsel weaver-retroactivity weaver-v-massachusetts
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the federal law of Weaver v. Massachusetts, 137 S.Ct. 1899 (2017) have retroactive application in the state of Maryland?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : . , _ 1, DOES THE FEDERAL! UAW OF WEAVER V. MASSACHUSETTS, 137 S.Ct. 1899 (2017): HAVE RETROACTIVE APPLICATION IN THE STATE .OF MARYUAND? 2. DOES A TRIAL! COUNSEL! RENDER INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL , WHEN HE VIOUATES HIS CLIENT’S FEDERAL AND STATE UAW RIGHT, TO BE PRESENT AT a EVERY STAGE OF TRIAL? , 3. DOES AN APPELLATE COUNSEL! RENDER INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL', WHEN . HE FAILS TO RAISE ON DIRECT APPEAL THE VIOLATION OF HIS CUIENT’S FEDERAL! AND STATE LAW RIGHT, TO RE PRESENT AT: EVERY STAGE OF TRIAL!?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent Maryland to respond filed.
2019-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)