Whether the Minnesota Supreme Court erred

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Minnesota Supreme Court erred by concluding in In re Victoria and Stephen Carlson (A18-1578, Minn. 2018)--in conflict with the decision of this Court in Goldberg v Kelly (1970) and innumerable cases in that line of decisions; and with the decision of the 8th Circuit case Pediatric Specialties v. ADHS (2004)--that a county Agency and Minnesota Department of Human Services (MNDHS) need not continue to pay Medicaid medical assistance breast and cervical cancer benefits (“BCCPTA” and “MA-BC”) to an appellant who has attained a favorable commissioner’s decision reversing the unlawful termination of her federal Medicaid and breast cancer treatment benefits, and ordering the continuing payment of MA-BC benefits while that appeal is still pending unresolved and while the appellant remains in uncompleted cancer treatment under the BCCPTA program.