No. 18-8520
Aaron Haas, et al. v. City of Richmond, Virginia, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure court-procedure document-evidence documents due-process facts judicial-review legal-relief procedural-fairness relief standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Would the court provide due process when facts and documents to entitle relief are provided to the court are not never considered?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED . Would the court provide due process when facts and documents to entitle relief are provided to the court are not never considered? Gi.)
Docket Entries
2019-09-19
Case considered closed.
2019-04-29
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until May 20, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-08
Waiver of right of respondents City of Richmond, Virginia, et al. to respond filed.
2019-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2019)
Attorneys
City of Richmond, Virginia, et al.