Did the District Court and Court of Appeals properly consider sentencing guidelines and factors?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the District Court For The District of Minnesota (district court) fail to give proper consideration to sentencing guidelines and policies while the United States Court of Appeals For The Eighth Circuit (Gourt of Appeals) did not ensure compliance? A. Did the district court properly-consider all : statutory sentencing factors? B. Did the court of appeals ensure compliance in reviewing reasonableness of sentence imposed? II. Did the district court fail to put on record the reason for imposing the chosen sentence as applied by policies and as cautioned by the Court of Appeals? A. Did the district court fail to indicate how petitioner's , assistance was evaluated? B. Did the district court's failure to articulate sentencing reasonings allow for appellate review to promote the perception of fair sentencing? III. As a result of the above, taken individually or cumultively, is a significant sentence disparity created, affecting the integrity and public reputation of the courts in the Eighth Circuit in a normal case that requires relief by the Supreme Court in the manner of resentencing for a reasonable and proportionate sentence? 7 o LIST. OF PARTIES All parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. di