No. 18-8539
Blake Joseph Sandlain v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights district-court due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jurisdiction remedy standing writ-of-certiorari
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's case
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : DLS We DISTELCT CoukT USE “DECTA) | OR WoLDING WES TT Loreds ON The CASE SAMSOW_V CALL EGINEAQOOIN PETER FIRsi BASS TP Ld REVETROWEL YSE CoS ACTION AS A RROVER WWOTVRod TO RTTACK The DEFECT TN. TE TNTEGRETY OF THE DISTRICT COUT) YSELUG ADTCTA LOLING Yo Dev) A CoGNTe ABLE ENETTECTANE ROSTSINME OF Cousset | CUMIN ys WES PrRSt 9255? |
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 24, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent