No. 18-8549
Keith D. Goodman v. I. D. Hamilton, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure district-court due-process facial-unconstitutionality fourth-circuit habeas habeas-corpus second-or-successive second-successive-petition standing statutory-interpretation unconstitutional-statute
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a § 2254 (habeas) claim of a conviction under a facially unconstitutional statute is sufficient to overcome a statutory 'second or successive' determination by the district court
Question Presented (from Petition)
question presented is: 1.) whether a § 2254 (habeas) claim of a conviction under that facially unconstitutional statute is, by itself, able and sufficient fo overcome a statutory ‘second or successive’ determination by the district court? . ii
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-10
Waiver of right of respondent I. D. Hamilton to respond filed.
2018-06-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2019)
Attorneys
I. D. Hamilton
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent