No. 18-8556
Alimamy Barrie v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 amendment-doctrine appellate-counsel habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel mayle-v-felix relate-back-doctrine
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Relate Back doctrine announced in Mayle v. Felix allows for an amended motion to relate back to an original claim of ineffective assistance of Appellate Counsel on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion when the amendment only added additional fact(s) that Appellate Counsel was ineffective
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether the Relate Back doctrine announced in Mayle v. Felix, 545 U.S. 644, 664 (2005) allow for an amended motion to relate back to an original claim of ineffective assistance of Appellate Counsel on a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion when the amendment only added additional fact(s) that Appellate Counsel was ineffective. i
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 25, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent