Whether the court of appeals erred in denying petitioner's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's failure to object to the confrontation clause violation during trial, and whether the district court abused its discretion in denying petitioner's habeas corpus petition

Questions Presented Conn) — te the _shits_conct oP appants thaleter, canal fonled +a ee _fectitiner tack be bok Dee ight to Ble a bfietl an bs a feview) Ne Cececd and Gred dy comply soisNn Vee a 8 Stee pale (1907), DA tHe Distt Cont vache a Rabtnoner’s canstitdironadh cidets Io sha Phiny Qador's , ct as ha Shits cc ob appa te Rdaoned’s \owtleckwe assistance Pa opal counsah chats? :