No. 18-8560

Hakeem Sultaana v. Chae Harris, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction fact-claims habeas-corpus jurisdiction-powers-28-usc-1291 jurisdictional-powers pending pending-case publication sixth-circuit u.s.c.-section-1291 void-order
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals can ignore its jurisdiction powers under Title 28 U.S.C. §1291 and file a void order on October 31, 2018 without publication, when the fact claims remain pending in Sultaana's habeas corpus petition in the U.S. Northern District Court of Ohio Case No. 2016-CV-02884

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CAN IGNORE ITS JURISDICTION POWERS UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. §1291 AND FILE A VOID ORDER ON OCTOBER 31, 2018 WITHOUT PUBLICATION, WHEN THE _ FACT CLAIMS REMAIN PENDING IN SULTAANA’S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN THE U.S. NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF OHIO CASE NO. 2016-CV-02884.

Docket Entries

2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Chae Harris to respond filed.
2019-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Chae Harris
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael FlowersOhio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Hakeem Sultaana
Hakeem Sultaana — Petitioner
Hakeem Sultaana — Petitioner