No. 18-8560
Hakeem Sultaana v. Chae Harris, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction fact-claims habeas-corpus jurisdiction-powers-28-usc-1291 jurisdictional-powers pending pending-case publication sixth-circuit u.s.c.-section-1291 void-order
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals can ignore its jurisdiction powers under Title 28 U.S.C. §1291 and file a void order on October 31, 2018 without publication, when the fact claims remain pending in Sultaana's habeas corpus petition in the U.S. Northern District Court of Ohio Case No. 2016-CV-02884
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED WHETHER THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS CAN IGNORE ITS JURISDICTION POWERS UNDER TITLE 28 U.S.C. §1291 AND FILE A VOID ORDER ON OCTOBER 31, 2018 WITHOUT PUBLICATION, WHEN THE _ FACT CLAIMS REMAIN PENDING IN SULTAANA’S HABEAS CORPUS PETITION IN THE U.S. NORTHERN DISTRICT COURT OF OHIO CASE NO. 2016-CV-02884.
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-11
Waiver of right of respondent Chae Harris to respond filed.
2019-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2019)
Attorneys
Chae Harris
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent
Benjamin Michael Flowers — Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, Respondent