Whether the trial court erred in convicting the petitioner despite the lack of testimony from a key witness and the prosecutor's misconduct in handling the witness's unavailability

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED © fieehad. to Mepend | wyoming Palice Report dated H-/4-1/ whore witness stiles he ne longer ° had tesi+ mesbages. Yet: trial court used i+ bo conviedt ne..Drn errective Coungel-trial Counsel.@ uniform act WonProcuchion of crucial w/tness ' &. Arundmont Vilatians, confrontation Clause, Busta monte errac Prosector MiSconducl= Prosecution Purpose archastihed stotemat Aa. read bo lury whet a) cart effec’ ehhGrtiaa a= clue Agence and cache n! iOS, why aid 2, di 4 ent Panel oe dudges aecida on my Habeas writ ia bh circuth of Appeals one for me, and 2g9in&t mee @ Trial dudge naver held Prosecution te 3 court ofGiiers Outy whan i'n Fact Prosecutor admits he onl made. 21 Phona calls, teanser iprts Volume. 2) pages 18, 19, 2o, and » p23 8, Uniform pet shold ve heen activated t+ this pont. The more. Crucial wrtnesSs> the. greater the effert required to Seture. his Stterdance.. the more. im ertant the, witness to the Gov nmenk case the more inpertarit the dependant Rights. Dial duidge never srvestigated conf ls : ti eons or Seiten pel A 9 6 yar pee ce ereey and, Retibione Vol. L pages Jey to 175, LT cefused 3; plea cleals this angered my tial AT. % a reSult it te Flee ed 1a har cepresensation. U:3.C.B Const."Amend. 6, auto matic reversal withect demonStiotion of prejudices. 256, mFarland v. Yukins. Teial counsel main Focus wis te be. chne WEF her constrbrtional obligation as a public. defender.» Wo Meetings with Petitioner Ma chSeussian of Trial Strabégy with Petrbioner, ace. only meetings were tris | appearances. This is evidence. al Harm and prejuchiae» hver abfected te ast of couck State ment hoing Read te fury. why was Prosecator allowed fostrategically ard careful aft his Gueshans te tn at alo fee wFhic St unavil fable. Weeness? MeliGbner wi devatod etal Ee achek ve soe Ec eoabe) bp Henne Si yce Xe effectivaly. cress examine. and “impedch NoN-precloetion of SaacSonAwsinesss soy . cout of Prpeals, Mics Suprema Court, LS. Nistritt Court, 2 If rétords of trial proce ings are. Faulty and ambiguous: accord, to Nc Atbomey general Office. Shale couct and Arne Cenc»! CFF ic i es, ° vy a ice are not In a pasition ts evaluate. trial court ¢ ADS 2 « Information 7/$ on p 5S, 4&F tne vo eb there IS no concedhig ? this on | age. é orney Gen eco) s Brie& the ©. Je ps ney reSpenSe Drie 2 Law works Oy, ame. way everstime. My guestien is why AA He not woeK sy MY CHSe-+.? ‘RY Wad a officer Swi re ; Cy dale Scere Newel 4 cole ply v’highuitness mn raaccut BHMESENG HaStuction Ne hearing chro’ Sumiie Pe planing enavaidable 131, Toil Judge only inStruction to 12, O14 foogeeipt Val. 4, Pages 12.9, 130, Haw can a hiry distegand a police ed was 20. J/ anit ExchihitS /onJ2 King specicie au eMions 90 ec fa Pasting as witnest/ Wetin and Prose carte r y Nor guilty Veerobick 2 (Impecstable-)