Whether a trial attorney's failure to object to the omission of a required jury instruction raises the burden of proof on direct appeal, where the outcome would have been different had the objection been made

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED . IF A TRIAL ATTORNEY'S FAILURE TO OBJECT TO THE OMMISION OF A REQUIRED INSTRUCTION FROM THE JURY CHARGE RAISES THE BURDEN : OF PROOF ON DIRECT APPEAL, WHERE, HAD TRIAL COUNSEL PROPERLY OBJECTED AT TRIAL THE OUTCOME OF THE DIRECT APPEAL WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT, DOES THE SECOND PRONG OF STRICKLAND APPLY? ti } 7 | . . PARTIES ; All parties to the case are listed in the caption of the cise on ; . the cover page. : oe \ ada | .