Whether the Court erred in properly applying Rule 52(b) to the issue of Harmless Error raised by the petitioner during the numerous appeals pursued

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether the Court erred in properly applying Rule 52(b) to the issue of Harmless Error raised by the petitioner during the numerous appeals pursued. 2) .Whether the Court erred by allowing the petitioner's Constitutional Rights to a fair trial to be violated by the State Prosecutor's inflammatory and erroneous comments . which infected the jury resulting in a conviction and denial of due process. 3). Whether the Court erred by allowing Circuit Court judge ' by the allowance of , oo, evidence of other-crimes in comparison to Leonard J. Weber in 2004. 4) Whether the Court erred by allowing evidence where no charge was pursued and proof was not introduced sufficient to support a finding that the fact did exist. 5) Whether the Court erred in its decision by allowing evidence of other-crimes for prejudice, confusion, or other reasons and agreeing with lower Court's decision of Harmless Error. 6) Whether the Court erred in its decision to allow Lower Court to deny Motion for New Trial when jury had not been told that the evidence was used in error thereby (i) ? raising the concern of a violation of Equal Protection of the Laws. 7) Whether the Court erred in its decision to allowsmother of victim's testimony to corroborate the victim's testimony when the victim said no one was home or around. . (i)