Whether petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights were violated when he was convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance beyond a reasonable doubt where he possessed 15.5 grams of cocaine on his person

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a . |: Nas peliboner proved 6o nol ptoled | oily ot on lao possession wilh Inkent Lo del Wer a. vocleslel substance beyond a fesona ble doobt where he possessed 1$.5 Sons of Cotaine On kis peson, CA amount police ov cer US. Const. Amend Yiu, Til Cont. of 470, Ael F ga. . People, Ve Roblasen 167 Il. yd S47, GST ME. Ad. jor C1445). | 4 ; L: Should Cavse he Pemended i fesembeneing de cause, Seal Sedge beleve pet hiner Was elt ble Pe 9° do GO when tadach Vac Mae mum Sinteate Was 39 yews ‘So ro sideced rAnlo Ace f ' > TONLE proper Spfontng Behes: L mp toper! Cons dered Perkin Cher we Tio / Peode vu. Uller ») D7 TPO FLES $76/Yo% Cesd gon (#87 SI 3d $39 93/ WE Od sy (20/0) 3: Les pk hone S Duc Process tights volved Chen Dev! wing cout Cons dete l Cases delidat Wes paler ersed Aol Cond icded of 2 | VF Uss labor's consti! fb weleb hen Atal cour Sheate's «bhsey matated el dine? Lom labve Med of prsecuberia | Mi'sconduche data loot abosed ‘Le Vsetelion, ewe pet Vener’, Conse | We nel bu? $: Was pebdioners (ons lubione! nichts vide J whese Nea (our ¥ SNele's cPolne Krasirgl used, Dice ev dence dy releeathg AD Sith Lil als dh Jand drat NIZES Said J, Le h phous Dare | hid Was newer ade Md Indo evidence! © Vas pathos Condubi nel f ‘5h I, Wolk. kd whan naples allow Yast courk hiesion to dey, oubihonurs pe Se Poste Conviclon pln nix he. LheglSee hae aS pbtoners hued A Vi st ot olin? . \ .