No. 18-8586
Roderick Black v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-licensing constitutional-law constitutional-violation criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-counsel ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel sixth-amendment standing
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's sentence should be vacated in light of his trial attorney not being duly licensed to practice law in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights under the Federal Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : :
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent