Takings HabeasCorpus CriminalProcedure
Was the trial fair when key defense witnesses were not investigated pretrial, court denied Defendant's request to cross examine government medical expert, and court cut off Defendant's statements about potential causes of the opioid epidemic?
No question identified. : : e . “QUESTIONS: : 1° Was the trial fair when: . , prosecution took 5 days of testimonies and defense none : 7 key defense witnesses were not investigated pretrial court denied Defendant's request to cross examine government medical expert while expert made 31 meritorial errors on 32 presented patient charts court cut off Defendant after "I may have discovered cause of opiate ' epidemic" and "In Poland... [500 years ago there was epidemic]" — ~ court did not provide allocution, whereas Defendant plead not guilty : a there was no time for Defendant to. present reduction of medications that ‘led to elimination of overdose mortality and discovery of the. disease a , that leads: to massive opiate use? : a . + And this is just the tip of the lawberg of lack of trial time for the defense! 2° Did the defense trial counsel created the third prong of Strickland v. ; Washington, when he did not investigate and subpoena any witnesses, did not . ' prepare and present any evidence, could not find charts of patients during expert testimony, and used strategy during Motion for New Trial Hearing of : , : . oo blaming Defendant for what he did not do? The third prong is: "Would Defendant | Lao be better off without trial defense counsel?". ; . 3° ‘Is United States v. Moore (1975) applicable to chronic pain treatment? , . : 4c Does §802-Addict describe chronic pain patient: treated with opiates? , 5°. Does usual course of medical practice §1306.04 (opening medical office, ; “hiring office staff, opening business checking account) mean madatenance of 7 , "premises, conspiracy to traffick drugs, money laundering? 6° «as "Except as authorized" of $841 an enticement to attract physicians to : _ practice chronic pain treatment that disappears for the trial? , . : om , i ~(a).