Did the Utah appellate court err in holding that the erroneous jury instruction, which impermissibly shifted the burden of proof onto Petitioner/Defendant Romo to prove imperfect self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt, was not prejudicial?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED =z Did the Utah appellate Courh exc in holding ther | the Erroneous jury instructton , which impecrmissioly shifted the burden oF proof onto Romo +o prove imperfect seifdefense veyond a reasomable doubt, was not. prejudteial 2 a Dia the Udah appellate dourk coc in Weld ing that trial counsel was net ineffective for failing +o osject +o improperly elicited test avowy that was lwrelevant ane prejudiclal ?