Did the 5th Circuit deny certiorari as untimely, when under mailbox rule is timely filed?

No question identified. : QUuEST/on/> PRESEWTED DID WE 44 Sego-Ghi deny CEertkelatr AS emtimels ) whew vuder malbex rule is , timely hifed ? J3 s7 THE sone/76e JATTY. CEVERALS DpeTy ge PRESS 7HS CAUSE OF ACTION TO PROTEET V5. ATIZEWS VESTED 4£/BERTT INTEREST SLO3sTANTIE Nights niles e+ i op aud fame tSIES at oF e HAS THE TRUE PROPER PERSon) ARP. RESPONPEWMYT GONCE LED the case by He tal Jeffer. oF the law Fa lure +o pesper, fo thie FIRST STEP as Ts WE La. Qrst. (974 Megat as repugesart Jo THE VS. Grs7-s MoT KAW HS BEE A te DATE APGROVE? BY Cow FRETS OR WE La. Cons f7426 7 43 PAW RELATAR > substatie and Relb/ou% ro bts eo £6L0 SPOKE UEARETES PhaoteetEbD feet THE US -CosTART Te ape Scot LET and Amen hmeAs Kank XV. I HAS RESPONDENTS WorsaTED pelptors opt oof gh? oF estoy oC relafed to fhe MASTER. -ToBAGOCLASS -— ACTIAW — seve wet by n@roach.rg ugar Ais rel 5/eos substan? /ve ris Ye HL SAKE TALK” {1 geflebrakonw’ of he first ew! versa ls recag yi zed HOLY SA pCE ComPieniios freer of refi bo Kypess/ IAS Mous ards of years old .© DOES HWE US. QWS7 SUPPORT /Cbi/DOV2. Bd STATES Aental offAEE Fel “or4 20KE TALK BEA.” Gomtte nO 2 Resgmdats have pevere. to hate produced [rite ang rétords Avg rithows fe Sygert ther aflaatey Yhar Ko devial of relaters rg4t fe sale ss py hs seter.éee ach DOL poh Ez cate de fet ble AE be, seruitrda ; does the tut Redluce deny be risAt po Presem rian, ot INN OCCQa___ protecte) 4, Aven d Hie DeES We RESfa PEAT Aarons) sala@ on ViOLAVTE = BLATERS UENUMERAED (2ét/T oOar! soserte we. Caw he ha heq~ Jha, Deg of Poblie Satety avd brrestiows retroactively ehavee a debinik seutewce by akin, away Ae Ct 2eAs eight 5) Aol, 37.0.4, AIS Cigar tes Ugen prble ]@ Prepa7, mative) be agar ere Yo2ae Lol/ars 7 I> HWE SECESS1O0—0 2F THE sTH7e OF LOO 3 tA PYAR oy 4s fatlsce eo Ofese 04 yeet to yer reba fret Phe frcaatond! fant of ([lezali€y ok fo BAL Const: ie by res spond ats a> NEVER Aon sarKKh 1s CF ag ved b, Heo US Congres por hae OE OS. Gree Art. TL Sect. 3.01)? Witkeot any Jatler. of te. law deliwthod ok Wars BEXB” for Purygeses oF aac, bsaieide stitutes caw ans verde” FOS pw jwseFFlasene-g of evideree’ Pees we FRoiOAIT¢IN ABAIAST @/77 2 & S22KWE CIBARETIES Ov PROFMERTY FAIR FOR A ntbbs pnirtosed b, FOBAILO TAX DoLLAe> pesserec® Sim Crew seerake bour~z sah atizer shop CVASSAS Ce pezwehT 7e bow vs Beard of of Edveathad | BY7 US. ¥YS33 (C2 vsFlessén Ve Farguse~) Y{ LBD ast (19%) IL AS OPP #2HAS WEVER GEE PoszeD OY AVY 08ST 15 47 TRUE Doe Aeocess (wy az onl Gre eet en oe ¥te LA ? CAV AMT STATE COnS7IFTUTHE*ELEF TARE QITVV7ZGrs PEACE RELIGIoN FRoTKOTEO theres: the OS-Comsr Amend DE/XIZ. 2 CW R/S COURT AnsSaNER WE RIPE ARP.G DW .G.0. -2015OVS of aud D.tv.0 .C.-2019— 9 ZIZ Fee H