No. 18-8597

Barbara E. Brown v. Scott Burton, Deputy Sheriff, in His Individual Capacity, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-immunity judicial-misconduct obstruction-of-justice search-warrant standing state-court-liability trespassing unreasonable-search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether District Court Judge Cormac Carey obstructed justice under the definition of 18 U.S.C. 1503 when he refused Petitioner Counsel?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED DeFination of Logic; The Principle of Correct Reasohing, L. whether District Court Judge Cor mac Carey obstructed justice under the definétion of THe (BU5.C1503 when he refused Petihener Counsel ? QZ. wheter Carney and the Thicyit judges erred in holding etitioner, a pls se complaint, ie More Stfngent Standards than frm! pleedtigs “Ab eed by [iw fers ' ‘han, te Haines vKerner, yot u.5, 519 (1974)? 4, er YeliSoners Right +o Redtess was Violeteg by Carney qth and US. Sept lath HY. Whether a reasonable judge can oractice law and aid bet la Wes nlplie? ( , . 5, whether Carney ¢ Phe, J udges erred in ver their Oaths of office to defend us, losthaont 6, Whether Carvey Consgired with defendants wl en he ordered Petitioner arrested for trespashy ? 7, Whether Carney erred in agreeing with Police vko Violated Pet ongrs th anevlraent ! right yom nt unreasonable Seach and sefzure ? B. Whether Carey Piatt uly erred in Stating Peftfener has no right +o Lassen her wg ist agalhst “ynwarranted inttusion y the Shite! 1. whether Carhey § Heir. judges etred in allowing police fo break the Jew/ under Schmereer ¥. CA BIS. %57(1966) protect personal pritacy and dignity Pr JO-ulhether District Court Svdge Carney Can leally operate his Coutt under Bleck (ode ua reiel Carney enced in namin all four Cases of det oners: Related!” trom General seid not © 12 Whether lent enfotcers eccell in falsely artesting Retitioner without 2 aN Cause? ° \3. wether eMarna Nene ° de 48 (ah) Violates Petitioner vis pales ANd Guaranrees ~ ined in 4.5. Constitution ond Bill of Rights Human Kiglts Soherat-byhtst IH. Whether Calfonia Renal (ade (4800/4) is unconstStvtional due +o tt bein. Vagne and armbigOUls. 3 |S. whether Carney Eq ete, ‘yilges derive Petitioner gf the right tyail? \6. whether Carney € Eick erred when neither ohe disqualiFied theniselves in which tne imparhiality might reusohably be questioned 7 ” 17, Whether Ale 28 U.S.C. Seetisn #55(a) includes any Justice Jude ob Masisticte Judge of the U.S. °

Docket Entries

2019-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-08-01
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-06-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-09
Reply of petitioner Barbara Brown filed. (Distributed)
2019-04-25
Brief of respondent Scott Burton; Travis Wijnhamer; Tom Hollenbaugh in opposition filed.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2019)

Attorneys

Barbara Brown
Barbara E. Brown — Petitioner
Scott Burton; Travis Wijnhamer; Tom Hollenbaugh
Dennis Earl WagnerWagner & Pelayes, LLP, Respondent