No. 18-8603
Gralyn Leon White v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-924c aiding-and-abetting brandishing consecutive-sentences criminal-law due-process fifth-circuit first-step-act hobbs-act united-states-v-lewis
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals err by failing to apply the holdings of United States v. Lewis, 907 F.3d 891, 894-95 (5 Cir. 2018) to Hobbs Act claim?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Did the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Err by Failing to Apply the Holdings of United States v. Lewis, 907 F.3d 891, 894-95 (5 Cir. 2018). to Hobb’s Act Claim II. Cana consecutive sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(1)(a)Gi) for brandishing as an aider and abettor still stand after application of the First Step Act and this Court's recent jurisprudence? “iit
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent