Whether the court of appeal's decision below contradicts existing legal principles when evaluating a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and giving contradictory rulings based upon race and gender for the purpose of resolving discrimination cases based on the same pattern and practice of illegal conduct by the same creditors

QUESTIONS) PRESENTED @ Whether the court of appeal’s decision below contradicts existing legal principles when evaluating a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and giving contradictory rulings based upon race and gender for the purpose of resolving discrimination cases based on the same pattern and practice of illegal conduct by the same creditors. Gi) | Whether the court of appeal’s decision below adversely affects the public’s perception of the unbiased nature of the judiciary in a high profile case in the use of renewable energy sources when a substantial burden is placed on litigants to be granted recusal relief from a clearly biased judicial . officer and the disqualification of a judgment when it is shown that the Judge had an undisclosed financial interest in the case.