No. 18-8608

William Ramirez, et ux. v. Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2019-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment precedent pro-se state-court statutes
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should a pro se petitioner reasonably expect that a state court at the county level follow precedent as a part of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, if all criteria for said relief detailed in applicable statutes and/or rules of court have been met?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (Rule 14.1(a)) 1. Should a pro se petitioner reasonably expect that a state court at the county level follow precedent as a part of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, if all criteria for said relief detailed in applicable statutes and/or rules of court have been met? 2. Is the Fourteenth Amendment’s “equal protection” clause applicable to state statutes and/or rules of court regulating following the statutes and precedent of higher state court decisions, when said rules make it plain that a lower state court is to be bound by the decisions of the state court of appeals and/or the state supreme court? i

Docket Entries

2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-04-19
Waiver of right of respondent Megan Mangiarcina to respond filed.
2019-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Megan Mangiarcina
Scott W. SonersAlling & Jullson, Ltd., Respondent
Scott W. SonersAlling & Jullson, Ltd., Respondent
William Ramirez
William Ramirez — Petitioner
William Ramirez — Petitioner