No. 18-8610

Antonio Sierra v. Josh Shapiro, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, et al.

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2241 article-iii civil-procedure constitutional-review district-court due-process habeas-corpus judicial-jurisdiction jurisdiction procedural-impairment standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the District Judge of the Custodial United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania is precluded from exercising Article III. and 28 USC § 2241 Jurisdiction and/or powers, when form over substance upon the Great Writ produced dispositive Opinions for the process at issue

Question Presented (from Petition)

ESTION PRESENT | , Whether the District Judge of the Custodial United States District Court for the Western District of ’ Pennsylvania is precluded from exercising Article III., and 28 USC § 2241 Jurisdiction and/or powers, when form over substance upon the Great Writ produced dispositive Opinions for the process at issue [?] Whether the animated. principles underlying the Great Writ, preserves its Constitutional availability ; for a fair review, notwithstanding the lapse in the case where facts and evidence have no bearing on the judgments and the Great Writ of Habeas Corpus on its own is caused impairment [?] 1 |

Docket Entries

2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-03-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Antonio Sierra
Antonio Sierra — Petitioner
Antonio Sierra — Petitioner