Leonard Dwayne Hill v. United States
Whether the 'terminal ballistics test' used to determine the dangerousness of ammunition is properly applied in this case
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED a3 (CU Lone. Circuit Spit” /5 16K Cite TPXa)b) Unionsh tion Fo Ley (USE) The 23.Live Ronds ©f Ammonition Was -Vuabictued. ha Assynbed tr “the. (Sameslde) were delGlert-ums Arestal atk -TT a . ( he oop Court Set vp the “Mrinal news test” 4p dink dbobets Look to(mycese) Phe“ wahaimal NEUKS hesk” js Lot Pitea’ See Scarboraush Vi. Valtedsdades 43) Us, 563, 5751177) ‘Cirevits iif Pepe stil Holding to the tacts in moshy. LOL 3 154 (9%, 19, tot No ATF Specaillist OR Ammunition Specailist” Mover testitiyeol to the facts En Mosby bised on Tatesede (ommerBee Ak crevit Also Short alts hngwished. bee booby (024 +0 its. eal With the 6Cixcurt Agreeing with the. LF Twas En ay ether Civeut Coorl! Lith +his Case, wold. their btn be. floral Jorisclichon over mM Vi (ase, | |