Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit err in its denial of Defendant - Appellant's Motion to be granted relief under the clarifying amendment regarding two-point and five-point sentencing enhancements that now require a mens rea element?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED | 1.) Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit err in its denial of Defendant Appellant's . Motion to be granted relief under the clarifying amendment regarding two-point and five-point sentencing enhancements that now require a mens rea element? . 2.) Did the court use a fine line to conclude that the Motion . is not a Title 28 U.S.C Section 2255, but rather a Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c)(2)? 4)