No. 18-8620
Joel M. Hicklin v. Harold W. Clarke, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel evidentiary-hearing habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Virginia Supreme Court erred in finding the petitioner's failure to investigate
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 7. Whether the Vir iulia Sutmeuc lour’ erred Sorlok LildinG Phe. Fetitioder’s foiluce 1b idvestiaate. Showsnl4 Com Prebrerlive’ 2. Whether the ebechive assistince of counsel's reauisite. 1p afawr trint and the r/aht % devertd Persanal 2 3, Whether the Viriilla Surmemelsurt erred for plot holed nig we Oo PleaarY hear il4 for cdl tole liWtuiry bio Phe lar vel Lox! teast ts the hoor FY01bs ot M4 Herlless Cac?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-15
Waiver of right of respondent Harold Clarke to respond filed.
2018-06-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
2018-05-17
Application (17A1274) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 28, 2018.
2018-04-10
Application (17A1274) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 29, 2018 to June 28, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Harold Clarke
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Joel Hicklin
Joel M. Hicklin — Petitioner