No. 18-8626
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: arrest constitutional-rights criminal-procedure defense-counsel due-process federal-criminal-procedure initial-appearance magistrate-judge plea-bargaining plea-hearing right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FourthAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was Petitioner Aaron Murray Entitled to an initial appearance before a United States Magistrate Judge under Fed. R. Criminal P Rule 5?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. Was Petitionex Aaron Murray Entiteled to an initial apperance before a United States Magistrate Judge under Fed. R. Criminal P Rule 5? Il. How was Petitioner Aaron Murrays first apperance in court a plea hearing? . IIlL.How did Petitioner Aaron Murray recieve attorney Paul Laufman as defense counsel? IV.How is it possible that Petitioner Aaron Murray signed a plea ..-deal before he was formally arrested, charged, or informed of the charges and advised his constitutional rights in open court?
Docket Entries
2019-08-05
Rehearing DENIED.
2019-07-11
DISTRIBUTED.
2019-05-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)
2019-02-23
Application (18A860) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 8, 2019.
2019-01-16
Application (18A860) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 5, 2019 to April 6, 2019, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent