No. 18-8627

Frank Martinez v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: disclosure fifth-amendment gardner-v-florida probation sentencing confidential-recommendation disclosure due-process fifth-amendment gardner-v-florida probation probation-officer sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the sentencing court's failure to disclose the 'Confidential Recommendation' of the Probation Officer regarding the Petitioner's sentence violated the Petitioner's due-process rights under the Fifth Amendment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The sentencing court failed to disclose the “Confidential Recommendation” of the Probation Officer in regards to the sentencing of the Petitioner. The failure to disclose is a violation of the Petitioner’s Due Process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and contra to this court decision in Gardner v. Florida 430 U.S. 341, 97 S.Ct. 1197, 51 L.Ed.2d 393 (1977). i. TABLE OF CONTENT PAGE Question Presented i

Docket Entries

2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2019)

Attorneys

Frank Martinez
Errol Henry StamblerLaw Office of Errol H. Stambler, Petitioner
Errol Henry StamblerLaw Office of Errol H. Stambler, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent