No. 18-8627
Frank Martinez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: disclosure fifth-amendment gardner-v-florida probation sentencing confidential-recommendation disclosure due-process fifth-amendment gardner-v-florida probation probation-officer sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-04-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the sentencing court's failure to disclose the 'Confidential Recommendation' of the Probation Officer regarding the Petitioner's sentence violated the Petitioner's due-process rights under the Fifth Amendment
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED The sentencing court failed to disclose the “Confidential Recommendation” of the Probation Officer in regards to the sentencing of the Petitioner. The failure to disclose is a violation of the Petitioner’s Due Process rights under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and contra to this court decision in Gardner v. Florida 430 U.S. 341, 97 S.Ct. 1197, 51 L.Ed.2d 393 (1977). i. TABLE OF CONTENT PAGE Question Presented i
Docket Entries
2019-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2019.
2019-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-03-25
Attorneys
Frank Martinez
Errol Henry Stambler — Law Office of Errol H. Stambler, Petitioner
Errol Henry Stambler — Law Office of Errol H. Stambler, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent